Getting Along with
Predation is a short-term interaction where the predator in the scenario is reliant on the prey for energy. An example of this relationship would be that of a bear and salmon. The bear actively hunts the salmon for sustenance. Bear diets aren't completely animal-based, however, and they often eat fruits and plants, which would be considered herbivory. Bears also go on the offensive in self-defense, but this interaction would not be considered predation in most cases. The bear would not likely consume the animal it was defending against, making the scenario not an inherently energy-dependent action.
ParasitismWhile researching this topic, it seemed that some folks consider parasitism an act of predation. At face value, this makes some sense as the relationship is a positive-negative scenario similar to predation. However, the interaction is long-term, depending on the host in the scenario to be alive in order for the parasite to gain benefit from the relationship.
|
Predation is a means to move energy around the food web. When animals consume plants, this predation is known as herbivory |
Parasites can do some astounding things to their hosts, from spreading disease all the way to extremes such as brainwashing! |
One of my favorite, somewhat gruesome, examples is a type of hairworm (Spinochordodes tellinii) and grasshopper. This hairworm will embed itself within the grasshopper and entirely sustain itself on the nutrients the grasshopper consumes. All the while, the hairworm is slowly altering the grasshopper's brain chemistry to a point that it can actually control the grasshopper. When the hairworm is fully grown and capable of reproducing, it will trigger a chemical attack on the grasshopper's brain. This causes the grasshopper to leap into a body of water where it will drown, allowing the hairworm to eject itself and find a space to reproduce. Truly fascinating (and terrifying) stuff!
CommensalismOkay, so let's walk away a bit from the gruesomeness of nature and look at a slightly more positive relationship. Tiny steps first, though. Commensalism is a positive-zero relationship where one party gets a benefit while the other gets seemingly nothing, positive or negative. These relationships are hard to pinpoint in nature since most organisms enter relationships with a goal of a positive outcome, a net gain of sorts. Most would wager that cases of commensalism may very well be a positive-positive relationship, but we haven't discovered both positive sides yet.
|
One example that I'd learned of recently is called myrmecochory, a term specific to a relationship plants and ants share with one another. Plants that live in particularly harsh or competitive environments need to find a safe or nutrient-rich place to disperse their seeds. However, right beside themselves may not be a great opportunity. Enter the ant, who lives alongside the plant in question. Some plants have developed sugary coatings around their seed casings that attract ants to them. The ants take the seeds back to their colonies and eat the pleasant sugary bits before dropping the remainder of the seed in a chamber specific to...well...refuse. Or, to the ants it's refuse, but to the seed, it's a nutrient-rich safe space underground for it to grow. The plant provides food to the ants and the ants provide a seed delivery service. Really neat!
AmensalismTaking a step back from all the positivity, we have the negative-zero interaction known as amensalism. This relationship is typically more accidental in nature, a side effect of something existing analogous to something else in a community. Often these interactions are unintentional due to the nature of one of the organisms, usually the one getting zero benefit from the interaction.
|
Some plants pay ants for seed delivery services by coating their seeds in sweet, sugary coatings that the ants love to eat. |
Plants and animals will find or adapt to niches, or specialties, in their ecosystems to avoid needless competition with each other |
CompetitionNow let's look at competition, the negative-negative interaction between organisms. In a competitive environment, multiple plants or animals may be vying for a shared resource or space. When this happens, there are a few choices that the creatures have: they duke it out, one of them migrates, or one of them adapts. In the case of actually competing or driving the other out, this is seen as a negative-negative for all parties since there is no clear winner of the resource. Any time that resource is needed, and both parties are there, neither is certain of which will come out ahead, be that being able to eat for the day or having a place to sleep.
|
One popular example of competition is the case study of "Darwin's Finches." These were birds that Charles Darwin brought back from the Galapagos Islands while he was traveling the world. Which, by the by, were not actually finches. They happened to be misidentified while traveling the world, but even after that was known, the study still reflects the misnomer in its common name. At any rate, Darwin thought that the differences in these birds' beaks were quite stark considering the smallness of the islands they inhabited. If they both required the same food source, how did they come to look and act so different?
Well, the answer is found in niches! The birds were, for a long time, in competition with one another. However, over time, they split off from each other, evolving traits that were conducive to different modes of finding and eating food. In this way, the original species panned out to fill certain niches on the island in order to continue living together without causing the population to die out. I guess not even negative-negative interactions have to stay negative forever! |
4 examples of Darwin's "finches"
|