Wading the Grasses of
Definition & HistoryWhen European settlers first arrived in the New World, they brought with them a notion that forests were the perfect natural ecosystem. Generally speaking, they considered trees to be the gold standard in a "proper" nature and grasses to be odd and in need of explanation if they were abundant. It was a massive surprise when, as they traveled west, they saw more and more grassland rather than woodland.
This was so much so that they didn't really have a name to properly describe it. The term "prairie," derived from the Latin "pratum" meaning meadow, is of French etymology, and was the popularized name for the area in Central North America during these exploration years. As time passed, people would use prairie synonymously with grassland, insofar to consider agricultural land as prairie or weedy open lots as prairie. It's almost like prairie was more of a concept than a firmly defined thing, and the further we get from it, the vaguer it seems. |
The term prairie is of French descent and became the popularized name of the Central North American grasslands as there was no great English term to describe the region |
Shortgrass prairies were found in the west Great Plains, while tallgrass was found in the east due in large part to local rainfall |
As mentioned above, we normally hear about prairies in terms of the grasses that inhabit the area, namely tallgrass and shortgrass. While this does help a bit in understanding the general look of the prairie, this doesn't necessarily mean that tall plants can't grow in shortgrass prairies or vice versa. The types of plants do vary greatly and what grows where depends greatly on local precipitation. Tallgrass prairies of the eastern Great Plains generally receive around 40 inches of rainfall annually, whereas the shortgrass of the western Great Plains gets roughly half that. The result is a lusher tallgrass ecosystem and a stockier shortgrass one.
|
You would think that with the very specific conditions needed for the prairie to take hold, it would likely need a lot of maintenance. Well, that's one of the fascinating things about prairies. So long as the climate, soil, and hydrology conditions are met, it can achieve successive permanence with only one act of maintenance: fire.
Prairies are one of the few ecosystems hyper-attuned to dealing with regular burning. This is likely due to generations of indigenous use of the land, burning grasses to maneuver wildlife into favorable hunting grounds. Over this time, the plants of the prairie learned to survive season-to-season after a controlled burn. Some plants even have seeds that only disperse after the protective shells are exposed to high heat! It's truly fascinating what nature can do to thrive in a regularly disturbed environment. To the point that the disturbance becomes an ally in its success. Astounding! |
The prairie is hyper attuned to the presence of fire, taking advantage of the space it makes and nutrients it unlocks while pushing out would-be invasives that can't handle the heat |
Prairies are a prime example of how humans and nature can work together in a sustainable way |
While I wouldn't say I was met with admonishment, the answer was more of an "it's complicated" than anything else. In modern ecology, we generally consider the arrival of the European settlers to be the point at which nature was touched by humans. Any human-nature interaction prior is considered to be natural. This considers the indigenous peoples as part of the environment rather than humans acting on it.
I will not disagree that European settlers certainly brought their own onslaught of change to the environment, but humans of all nature are capable of interacting with the environment. While we tend to consider the way indigenous folks interact with the environment to be way better than how we do in a modern era, it doesn't mean they didn't alter it from its "natural" state. It's just what humans do. |